Teacherovi's English Forum

الخيارات الثنائ&

mybb@mybb.ru (joshy) — Sat, 28 May 2022 16:05:26 +0300

https://advocatesnairobi.com/ص … 5;ي/
https://kerbymethodconsulting.com/ž … 05;-63248/
https://sanakanwalfashion.com/م&# … 8;ا/
https://angosiam.com/تح … 6;ي/
https://myfemalefunda.com/بع … 5;ذ/

ما هو أفضل الخيار

mybb@mybb.ru (joshy) — Sat, 28 May 2022 13:42:52 +0300

https://enjazalkhaleej.com/تž … 5;ر/
https://advocatesnairobi.com/ا … 8;ل/
https://myfemalefunda.com/it-ا … 5;ر/
https://advocatesnairobi.com/ا … 8;ل/
https://kerbymethodconsulting.com/ … 77;-16268/

ما هو أفضل خيار ث

mybb@mybb.ru (joshy) — Sat, 28 May 2022 08:02:43 +0300

https://advocatesnairobi.com/ت … 5;ي/
https://angosiam.com/تح … 5;ب/
https://advocatesnairobi.com/أ … 8;م/
https://advocatesnairobi.com/ا … 575;-2022/
https://advocatesnairobi.com/ت … 5;و/

ما هو تداول الخيا

mybb@mybb.ru (joshy) — Sat, 28 May 2022 05:47:18 +0300

https://starsone.site/سع … 5;ق/
https://enjazalkhaleej.com/ل¡ … 3;ي/
http://marebradio.com/ال … 5;ن/
https://myfemalefunda.com/تط … 0;ة/
https://kerbymethodconsulting.com/ … 77;-13231/

Uhnd12jsxcvsdf

mybb@mybb.ru (joshy) — Fri, 27 May 2022 07:31:44 +0300

https://starsone.site/بن … 7;ى/
https://advocatesnairobi.com/ت … 0;ة/
https://starsone.site/ال … 8;ل/
https://angosiam.com/اس … 9;ر/
http://marebradio.com/عا … 5;ي/

Movies vs. Videogames

mybb@mybb.ru (Ihavenoideea) — Tue, 17 Mar 2020 16:41:37 +0300

For teenagers and adults, watching movies is preferable to playing video games from the point of view of personal development. In my opinion, for the last two decades, video games have evolved in such ways that they are more efficient for personal growth rather than movies are, for a number of reasons.
To begin with, in contrast to movies, video games contribute a lot to attaining a diverse set of skills. For example, there are many games where multitasking is a necessity, like pressing keys all at once to score, collecting things while running, finding clues while also fighting off some zombies. In addition not only do you balance between tasks but also train your reflexes and creativity.
Secondly, online gaming also brings other attributes, such as teamwork and communication. An example in that sense is when you have to allay with different people on a gaming platform, to fulfill the same purpose, such as surviving or defeating the opponents. When socializing on a gaming platform, you also form friendships with other people and sometimes even learn a few words from a different language.
Admittedly, video games are time consuming activities, which is a problem especially for the youngsters who should rather concentrate on school. In addition, similar to movies, many games are extremely violent and without the parent's knowledge, such games could fall into the hands of unknowing teenagers, this way developing a violent side themselves. Nonetheless, there aren't too many downsides to videogames, the advantages making up for them.
In conclusion, though there are a few similarities between movies and videogames, I personally find the interactive side of games much more beneficial to personal development.

Should young people follow politics?

mybb@mybb.ru (Username Not Found 13) — Mon, 16 Mar 2020 14:54:47 +0300

In today's modern society, it is a very important quality to understand the politics of our country. The political changes nowadays affect people more than they can imagine and we should try to learn about them. But is it important to learn about politics from a very young age?
On one hand, everyone should learn about politics. Starting learning new things about the government at a very young age might help the person later in life with their awareness of the problems happening in the country. Moreover, understanding politics might help the children in the future with issues like the change of regime or the government. Having the appropriate knowledge, teenagers would be aware of the strong and weak points of every political party and they would know what decision to make when talking about voting or taking part in protest.
On the other hand, politics is too deep and too complex for a child to understand. Firstly, without the proper guidance, young people might be influenced to believe in something extremist. What is more, they can be easily attracted to a more radical side. Moreover, talking about politics and taking sides can result in conflicts with their family or friends. They can also become obsessed with an idea they could ignore other relevant topics.
In conclusion, studying politics from a young age has its advantages and disadvantages, but it depends on one's preference and interest whether they study it or not.

Privatise schools in Romania

mybb@mybb.ru (Username Not Found 13) — Mon, 16 Mar 2020 14:32:25 +0300

For the last decade, more and more schools in our country have become less appealing to students due to the poor conditions they offer. Therefore, most parents choose private institutions for their children. But should all schools be privatised?
On one hand, there are some advantages to this decision. Firstly, privatising schools would mean smaller classes so children would receive more individual attention. That being said, the students would learn more and they would study more efficiently. On top of that, children might behave more responsibly, being more disciplined. That can also be a result of the fact that parents will pay for most of the didactic materials.
On the other hand, privatising schools would have some disadvantages. Firstly, in our country, it would be harder to enforce this law since most private schools have a very high fee. Thus, there would be some persons in Romania (especially in rural areas) , who could not pay the education fees. Moreover, the fact that the teachers are paid from the parents' money would lead to them becoming more permissive with the children, even when they misbehave.
In conclusion, privatising schools in Romania has both advantages and disadvantages. While some people think it would be a good idea, others strongly disagree with it.

why you definitely should(n't) leave our beautiful country

mybb@mybb.ru (AidenJacks) — Mon, 16 Mar 2020 00:06:03 +0300

People from Eastern Europe are always trying to emigrate into the West, or even towards the North, because of promises of riches and happiness. Should teachers here, in Romania, encourage their students to persevere in hopes of emigrating, or would it be better if our brightest minds stayed at home?

On the one hand, the benefits of emigrating are clear from an individualist perspective. For the individual that leaves national soil to study or to work in countries like the UK, France, Germany, this can prove life-changing. The person in question is able to live a better life and have access to better services all-around, as well as earning more using what they learned.

On the other hand, emigration has already proven fatal for Romania. So many young adults have left for countries such as Italy, and that has led to the downfall of the economy. Romania is currently lacking a strong, young workforce and if the educational system were to encourage children leaving to study or to work in Western Europe, it could have unforeseen consequences for the future of the country.

To sum up, while mass emigration has already caused problems for the country of Romania, it is beneficial for the individual, providing them with a shot at a much better life. In the end, we need to decide if these changes are worth risking the economy of our entire country. If Romania were to step up and become a country similar like the ones Romanians emigrate to, they would have no reason to leave.

Privatizing Romanian schools

mybb@mybb.ru (Diana Banana) — Sat, 14 Mar 2020 18:00:28 +0300

Schools play a huge role in today�s society and every individual�s future. What school one goes to and what grades they have will influence their options for their College education which, in turn, will effectively influence how the rest of their lives will play out. With that being said, should Romanian schools be privatized?

On the one hand, privatizing schools will give each student a sense of responsibility and accountability for their grades and behavior that they would not have otherwise. A student must pay a certain tuition fee to be able to study there, which will, in turn, make them take school more seriously, as it is their money that they ultimately risk losing. To top it all off, private schools reserve the right to select their students, and so their behavior and grades will reflect upon whether they will be able to go to said school in the first place or not.

On the other hand, privatizing schools goes against each person�s human rights. Making each student pay for their education will make it inaccessible to those coming for poorer households, effectively breaching their right to education. In addition to this, privatizing schools also goes against a person�s right to equality and non-discrimination, since private schools favorize people with a high income, those being the ones able to pay for the better schools which will, inevitably, have higher fees than the rest.

In conclusion, while private schools do, in theory, help the students going to them become responsible and aware of their own actions, one must also take into consideration the implications that privatizing all schools in Romania has.

The Bacalaureat and literary analysis

mybb@mybb.ru (Diana Banana) — Sat, 14 Mar 2020 17:38:01 +0300

The bacalaureat is the exam that everyone who is hoping to graduate high school and/or get into College must take. While the subjects may vary depending on whether the student taking it studied humanities or sciences, there is one test neither is getting out of: the Romanian exam. This, however, raises the following question: Should literary analysis be part of the be required as part of the high school graduation exam in Romania?

On the one hand, being able to understand books is essential. While reading is one of the most important activities any cultured being could take part in, being able to understand and analyze what one is reading is what gives it its true value. Giving students literary analysis as part of the Romanian exam is one way to make sure that they are able to think and filter the information they are given by books so that they can understand it better.

On the other hand, however, it could be argued that the student will not be using literary analysis anywhere outside of literature classes. This fact would effectively make giving this on such an important exam almost entirely useless and a waste of time and resources. Instead, the student should be given as a test something essential for them to survive and thrive in the real world.

In conclusion, while literary analysis is an essential skill for everyone to have, making it a test that the student must pass to be able to graduate could be seen as redundant.

Romania and child labour

mybb@mybb.ru (Diana Banana) — Sat, 14 Mar 2020 17:12:07 +0300

Despite the fact that child labour has been declared illegal in most countries, there are still places in which it is still being practiced. One such place is the clothing industry. However, that raises the questions: Should the import of clothes from countries where child labour is not effectively banned be allowed in Romania?

On the one hand, Romania does not support child labour. Children in Romania are not allowed to work until they are sixteen or older, and allowing the import of clothes from countries of no such laws could be seen as Romania supporting them. Romania is, after all, paying them and effectively supporting their industry, especially considering that children working in this industry is extremely common.

On the other hand, Romania isn�t breaking the law itself. While importing the clothes from countries in which child labour is accepted is not ideal, it is not illegal to do so. Romania itself is not breaking any laws, it just buys materials from countries who do so. Furthermore, banning import from said countries will not change what happens there. Unless every other country decides to cut ties with those places, just Romania doing so is not going to change anything.

In conclusion, this is, ultimately, a question of ethics: while banning the import of clothes from countries in which child labour is still practiced will make a statement regarding Romania�s stance on such matters, it won�t change anything that does happen in said countries.

Should the father have a say in abortion?

mybb@mybb.ru (Diana Banana) — Sat, 14 Mar 2020 17:09:35 +0300

In today�s world, abortion is becoming more and more common, and has been legalized in many countries all around the world. However, for a woman to get pregnant in the first place there must be someone to father the child, so that rises the question: Should the father have a say in whether the child gets aborted?

On the one hand, the child is as much the mother�s as it is the father�s. If the child were to be born, the father would have had as much of a say in the child�s life as the mother. So, it seems only logical that the father gets a say even before the child is born, especially if the mother plans on ending their life. Considering this, if he wants to get custody over the child, then the mother should keep the baby and go through with the pregnancy.

On the other hand, it is, ultimately the woman�s body. The woman is the one who gets pregnant and has to carry the child for nine months and then give birth to the baby. Considering this, and the fact that the father does not necessarily have to be there after the initial act for the child to be born, then it could be argued that it is, ultimately, the woman�s choice. So, if she decides that she doesn�t want to go through with the pregnancy, then it is her choice and the father should not have a say in this.

In conclusion, despite the fact that the child is as much the father�s as it is the mother�s, it could be easily argued that since the child isn�t born yet it is only the mother who has a say in whether she wants to go through with the pregnancy or not.

Posting online

mybb@mybb.ru (Sparkly mermaid) — Fri, 13 Mar 2020 13:47:57 +0300

The internet is a very large platform, which allows people from around the world to communicate. This means that anyone can write and poste anything. In some cases, people write untrue things, under a nickname or without an official approval, and causes panic in the worst scenario, or misleading people. For those people who are doing this intentionally or not we have to intervene and stop them. So, should they clarify who they are when writing or not?
On one hand, yes. All people who are writing or posting something, no matter how small or unimportant it is, should and need to have a true identity. As for the ones who are writing something big and important, they must have a proof that they are qualified to write what they want and the information that they are giving is trusted. Because if they do not others might take whatever is said on internet as good and that will lead to misunderstandings and chaos.
For those actions they should pay and take responsibility but because there are people who are hiding under a false name, they are not punished for their actions. And because of this we should imply much more sever rules to obligate the people to not lie about serious things.
On the other hand, there are some exceptions. For these, people might have approval to write and post under a nickname. Those exceptions are applied when you want to help but somehow from under the shadows. But these things are very complicated so people should pay more attention to the things explained above.
In conclusion, when talking about important things people should take full responsibility and post under a real name and with proof of official approval, with small exceptions. If we want to live in a good society, we need to improve ourselves and our way of thinking: not being selfish, not wanting to hurt others.

leave or stay, have your choice

mybb@mybb.ru (othellos78) — Thu, 05 Mar 2020 22:14:15 +0300

Nowadays, migration is a vastly known subject, as more and more ppl resort to it, in the hope of finding better living conditions, peacefulness and even safety.
Romania�s emigrant population is the fifth largest in the world and growing, according to the OECD report (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development). Because of this, should Romanian teachers promote emigration to richer countries or building a life on native soil?

On the one hand, emigrating might be the best solution. To begin with, high schoolers often think of their future. They see the disadvantages of choosing to stay in their native country: the opportunities of professional development are limited and so are the jobs. These drawbacks will not be present in richer countries, which means emigration is a noteworthy solution and promoting it would be recommended. Moreover, people choosing to move abroad will get rid of pollution. Richer countries have got entry fees for certain categories of cars ( which pollute more than others) to discourage using them. Instead, they provide citizens with well-defined bicycle lanes, unlike Romania.

On the other hand, building a life on native soil has its advantages. One of these advantages would be the ease of visiting their families. Clearly, traveling from a city to another city from the same country is much easier than from a country to another country. This is important because this will help reduce the chances of depression. About all the emigrants are said to have been suffering from depression, because of leaving their culture, habits and families. Moreover, they will never truly get rid of the invisible grating between their new fellow citizens. As much as they will want to belong, there will still be a gap amid emigrants and the others, a gap represented by the differences of culture, language and philosophies. Those stated above do not encourage the promotion of emigration.

In the end, all that matters is choosing what is best for everyone. Every pupil is allowed to make their own decision: either to stay in the country, where their families are and they are acquainted with the culture, either to leave and benefit from better living conditions.

what's with politics

mybb@mybb.ru (othellos78) — Wed, 04 Mar 2020 20:32:51 +0300

Young Romanians hardly know for sure what politics is or what it includes. As a matter of fact, no one has motivated or encouraged them to get acquainted with this world of the activities associated with the governance of a country. But should they passionately and actively follow the political life of their country or should they pay no attention, focusing on other issues instead?

On the one hand, politics can be explained to everyone willing to understand it. Demanding as it may seem, youngsters can and will be able to understand most of what politics deals with. The only complication is that there is quite a lot of information to take in, so they would need patience, a virtue which many lack. For example, they would need to get to know the ministries, the ministers, their scope, the constitution, the government representatives. But the information can be gradually taken in. Moreover, politics is everywhere. For example, one student needs to know their rights as well as their obligations. These can be found in the legal status of pupils which is decided by the Minister of Education. It is by actively following the political life of their country that they will know when and where there are changes to this legal status.
On the second hand, students and pupils don't have a lot of spare time. They don't necessarily need to understand politics to recognize their duties and privileges alike, because it will take up a lot of time which they don't usually have. Every year, their main teacher will read them the legal status, and if needed any other time, it can be found online, this way, they will have enough time to focus on education, or whatever is more important. Furthermore, a lot of politics don't influence or affect them yet. For example, the fact that one government representative is being replaced will not influence them soon.

In the end, politics is a way of involvement. It is not as scary as students and pupils see it, but it takes a lot of unnecessary time.

literary analysis : efficient or waste of time?

mybb@mybb.ru (othellos78) — Sun, 01 Mar 2020 00:59:45 +0300

Every year, every summer all 12-grade ~~romanian~~ Romanian pupils have to sit one of the most important exam.... : ~~A levels~~[asta e doar in Anglia] ~~the baccalaurate~~ the graduation exam.
There have been many changes to this exam, ~~however~~ (but)yet many still complain about the inefficiency of the current template of this stressful examination, .....[introdu aici subiectul analizei literare]. Should literary commentary or analysis no longer be required as part of the high school graduation exam?

On the one hand, literary analysis ~~displays~~ has a list of advantages. To begin with, it helps youngsters to develop a better critical thinking. All the classes ~~when~~ where the texts are studied, all the analysis makes[acord la plural] one think beyond letters, ~~So much so~~[pune un subiect, un predicat] ~~It is more true~~ all the more when one is allowed to dissagree with ~~the common~~ ordinary opinions, or with the exegets. Moreover, it grows the level enlarge the capacity of attention to details. In literature, there are numerous connections made with myths and legends and the more one makes, the better. A pupil can find them by closely looking to at the writing given.

On the other hand, literary commentary has ~~some~~ disadvantages. Firstly, too little of ~~the~~ modern literature still has connections with legends. Writers seem to have forgotten about creating a secret code. They choose to use everyday 's words, expressions, abbreviations so that it is easier for the young audience to read and understand. Secondly, in the exam, there are too many texts required. A pupil has to know the literary analysis on about 10 epic texts and on ~~other~~ 7 other poems. ~~To this extent~~ Becuse of this, it will be of no help to them, because one cannot write on the spot, so that leaves them learning the commentaries by heart, which is ~~bad~~ inefficient because it will erase from their brains, it will all wash off without leaving any mark.

In the end, literary analysis is helping many develop critical thinking and an eye for details, but if ~~they~~ pupils are loaded with required too many texts, it will be of no use to anyone.

Do we like private schools?

mybb@mybb.ru (eye_rolls_and_sarcasm) — Wed, 26 Feb 2020 21:49:17 +0300

Although in the past few years, some parents have chosen private schools for their children, the majority of education in our country is still public and, therefore, free. There is little information as to the student�s performance in the two systems, since they are so different, so it is hard to determine whether schools would be run more effectively if privatised.
On the one hand, having more money that comes directly from the parents would force the school to cater more to the needs of the children. Knowing that the institution�s funding comes directly out of their pocket, parents would most likely want their children�s needs to be put first and would probably object in some way if their children were to be mistreated, which hardly happens in public schools, especially as the students grow older. Also, teachers and staff would be more motivated to properly care for the student�s education and well-being at the same time.
On the other hand, making all schools private could become an issue for less wealthy families. Every child has the basic right to education, no matter their parent�s income. It is unfair not give them the tools they need in order to succeed in life and have, at least education wise, the same chances as everyone else. This could also lead to a higher number of drop-outs as there would also be a financial reason why children would leave school without graduating.
All things considered, private education offers students a healthier and more caring environment to grow up in but would discriminate against poor families. In my opinion, schools in Romania will continue to be mostly public, as poverty and students dropping-out are serious issues our country faces.

Young people and politics

mybb@mybb.ru (eye_rolls_and_sarcasm) — Wed, 26 Feb 2020 20:36:58 +0300

Politics all around the world are a heated subject and are often brought up in media or conversation, especially since it seems like there is always something new or something changing in the political life. Seeing as this subject seems to hold such an important role, should young people be passionately and actively involved?
On the one hand, it is very important to be aware of who is representing you, both internationally and regionally. Following political events helps young people form an opinion about who they want to support and vote for based on their own interests and beliefs, rather than just what their family�s preferred candidate is or whoever comes to mind first. This would also raise the percentage of young adults that go voting and the number of informed votes, therefore, the election would better represent the country as a whole, not just older generations.
On the other hand, young people should focus on other things rather than follow the political life. Firstly, politics can often become the main interest of someone who is passionate about this subject, making them loose their hobbies, and only care about this one aspect, instead of working on creating a better life for themselves and people around them. Secondly, when people become so involved and passionate about a subject that is already very controversial, a simple conversation can lead to an aggressive argument or even violent altercation. This already happens in Romania, seeing as having a civil contradictory discussion about things that affect us isn�t a focus in education of many people in this country.
All things considered, although young Romanians would be better represented, them following the political life of the country could bring damages to their lives as well as other�s. Still, more and more young adults have begun to show an interest in political events and probably the majority will follow.

abortion only with father's consent

mybb@mybb.ru (highbrowdaisy80) — Tue, 25 Feb 2020 00:01:53 +0300

Abortion is the ending of a pregnancy by removal or expulsion of an embryo or fetus before it can survive outside the uterus.[edfinitia e irelevanta, schimba cu context, tendinte despre avort] Should abortion be made with the father�s consent?
........[linker] It would be a bad idea to live by the father�s consent. To begin with, a woman as a completely responsible adult, knows what is best for her body and her wellbeing. If she considers she is unable to maintain a pregnancy for 9 months and then deliver a baby which she would have to raise, then the best thing to happen would be to get an abortion. Also, she might be able from any point of view to raise the child she is going to give birth to, but the father whose consent should be implied in the abortion�s approval could be abusive. He might be a drug or alcohol addict, or a cheater who wouldn�t have any time to raise the child, or a very violent person. If the child is born in any type of family described below, because it was his father�s wish, he would suffer traumas both physically and emotionally.
But on the other hand, a child is the result of an act that required two people to happen. The being that is going to come .....to this world in a couple of weeks from now on is a mix........ of its parents. Shouldn�t both parents decide whether the child is going to live or not? If the mother isn�t healthy or wealthy enough to raise the baby, its father could be the one to give him a chance to life.
To conclude, abortion is a very controversial issue debated in the whole wide world[asta e chestie de introducere, aici trebuie sa bagi rezumatul argumentelor], and the father�s consent in such decision just makes it worse to decide.

also name the baby heaven because there's where it's going to be🤪

Video games VS movies

mybb@mybb.ru (galactic_traveler) — Mon, 24 Feb 2020 23:15:53 +0300

Video games and movies play an important role in our lives today, being the main source of entertainment for many people. [leaga propozitiile]Nowadays, the topic of which one is better is hotly-debated. This essay takes a look at both sides of the argument.

On one hand, video games have many benefits for people. Not only do they stimulate the brain but they are fun as well. When playing games, because of their complexity[se intelege complexitatea jucatorilor], players are able to become part of the world, directly interacting with characters, connecting to the story in deeper lever that the majority of movies. Hidden quests and clues that make the tens of hours of game play a true adventure. Furthermore, games are not only about the story, but about mechanics as well. It is safe to say that the industry has greatly developed in the past years, games becoming more and more realistic, to the point of having people confuse them with actual movies. Many boundaries have been broken, opening a whole new era for game developers that strive to create worlds that captivate players� hearts. Exploring, fighting, hunting and creating bonds with the characters, games have the potential to even become virtual realities, as it can already be seen in gadgets such as the VR glasses.

On the other hand, movies ........... won the hearts of many thanks to their qualities. Since the first movie, people have been hooked. Even today, movies play a great role in people�s lives. Contrary to the opportunities that games provide[zi ceva rau, ca sa se lege cu ce urmeaza], movies are more accessible, being a better source of entertainment that the majority can enjoy. Although games provide more room for details, if the creator intends to just tell a story, a movie is the key for the meaning to reach more hearts. Furthermore, they are appreciated because of theatrical talent. After all, movies are a form of art and, just like theater, many enjoy following the actor's way of interpreting a role and becoming a character in another world. The young generation too looks up to these people, thinking of them as life models because of their dedication and heardwork.

In conclusion, both movies and video games have their benefits and disadvantages. Games offer a more detailed and dynamic way of telling a story while movies are more accessible and meaningful, making people fall in love with actors instead of virtual characters.

fun, hooked - informal

Abortion only with father�s consent

mybb@mybb.ru (galactic_traveler) — Mon, 24 Feb 2020 23:10:13 +0300

Abortion has always been quite a sensible topic for many people. While some believe that the father has a saying in the final decision of keeping the child or not, others think that only the mother should be able to make this choice. This essay takes a look at both sides of the argument.

On the one hand, making it mandatory to have the father�s consent for an abortion has its benefits. First of all, both parents have equal rights regarding the future of the unborn[practic ai folosit concluzia drept premisa - argument ciclic] child, therefore not only the mother, but the father as well should have a saying in the matter. Philosopher George W. Harris has stated that women aborting their child without the father�s approval is morally wrong because it be harmful, denying the right to become a partner. In some cases, the husband is the one that dedicates himself to the family and in the case of the wife becoming pregnant and deciding to not keep the child, the partner has no saying at all. There are also cases when a woman has a relationship as part of a strategy to hurt a man, misleading him into conceiving a child only to turn to abortion in the end. Moreover, in most countries, fathers have no right to veto or override a mother�s decision, making the law extreme. Although the woman has control over her own body, as both parents have a moral duty to provide support for their children and both genders have equal human rights, the father�s opinion should not be left unacknowledged.

On the other hand, allowing abortion only with father�s consent has its disadvantages. In the case of a pregnancy, the mother and the father are not in the same position to make a decision about keeping the child or not due to the fact that the woman has to consider her own body as well. While the father can only consider his and the child�s future, the mother has to go t......rough a painful process of delivering the child which she might not be ready for. A basic human right is that anyone can decide matters that involve their own body. Therefore, the father can have an opinion but no way to interfere with the mother�s decision. Furthermore, in ........ 21st century, forced pregnancies still occur, especially in countries like Syria or Saudi Arabia where ........ father�s consent is mandatory as well. If this would become an international law, chances are that the problem would spread all across the globe, putting women�s lives in danger.

In conclusion, abortion only with father�s consent has both its benefits and disadvantages, the father having a right as a parent to have a saying in the final decision just as the mother should have complete control over her own body.

extraordinary or meh

mybb@mybb.ru (eye_rolls_and_sarcasm) — Sun, 23 Feb 2020 23:19:09 +0300

In today�s culture,[pune virgula] an extraordinary life is presented as something doable by anyone, through all types of media where celebrities and generally accomplished people can tell their success stories, inspiring more people to desire a life similar to theirs. This has caused a fair share of controversy, leaving some questioning whether it is healthy to have such high standards for yourself.
On the one hand, having high expectations from life determines people to put more effort into their work. A desirable goal is mostly likely the best reason one would have to work as hard as possible to perfect their knowledge in their chosen field, therefore benefiting themselves but also their community or even us all, either through technological advancements, medical discoveries or perhaps, entertainment.
On the other hand, an extraordinary life is not a realistic aim to reach for. Not everyone has the possibilities, talents, connections or sheer luck that it takes to reach that point, and a majority of the people who try to aim for the stars end up not getting there.However ~~Whereas~~[asta se pune in mijlocul propozitiei, nu la inceputul ei], if they were to have had smaller, reachable expectations they would have been happier. For example, an aspiring actor leaves everything behind to go to Hollywood and pursue his dreams but doesn�t get any big break and ends up........ not wanting to live anymore. He could have had a peaceful, simple, more accomplished life, if he had learned to find his ordinary life extraordinary.
All things considered, although striving for an extraordinary life can benefit both the individual and the people around them, it can also be dangerous. Nevertheless, in my opinion, people will continue to shoot for the stars, inspired by the achievements of others that are constantly presented by the media.

sharp, logical and effective, yay, good work!

be a stressed blockhead or a flower power gal, you choose

mybb@mybb.ru (workinprogress404) — Sun, 23 Feb 2020 12:20:09 +0300

Aspiring to have a cheerful life is the natural way humans behave. This implies that one makes anything for the purpose of satisfying all their needs, including the need for self-worth. Nowadays, self-worth tends to be portrayed as having an extremely successful life: being rich and well-known by plenty of people, occupying the highest position at work. But is it really better to fight for an extraordinary life than learning to find the extraordinary ordinary life conceals?

On one hand, striving for an extraordinary life is for the good. People who have certain goals to work for are the most motivated to keep their life together. They make every effort in order to achieve the objectives they set for themselves. Many of them succeed because they have this mentality, and they surely have exceptional achievements. Furthermore, being an �extraordinary person� implies building certain aptitudes such as socializing, working in a team, helping people and being able to adapt in different situations. Someone who constantly works for their success is also working to become a better person, which is certainly long-term beneficial.

On the other hand, learning how to appreciate the small but incredible things an ordinary life brings is a great approach. It implies substantially less stress and so, one develops a healthier view over life. People who think of �insignificant� things as marvelous events, for example, the fact that they woke up ready to learn one day, are less disturbed and value themselves without comparing to so-called �better� people. They understand happiness as a simple concept that doesn�t involve overworking in order to achieve certain titles. Focusing on the simple things ordinary life brings is a healthy way to obtain peace of mind and a general state of well-being.

All things considered, although striving for an extraordinary life motivates people to work for their goals, appreciating simple life is also an acceptable way to be at peace of mind. Nevertheless, it�s hard to decide which option is the best, as different people think differently about what a cheerful life actually is.

Young people should follow politics

mybb@mybb.ru (galactic_traveler) — Fri, 21 Feb 2020 10:35:29 +0300

Today, politics are an important part of people's lives. [....linker]The topic of young people and if they should follow politics is a hotly debated one that often divides opinion. This essay takes a look at both sides of the argument.

On the first hand, there are benefits to young people being interested in politics. No matter if someone has the age to vote or not, being involved in politics means that you take your life into your own hands. The youth is the future of the world. There are not only few teenagers that believe the state of the country they live in is not quite favorable. Due to corruption and lies, young people view politics as something that cannot be helped. This is exactly why a younger perspective would improve what is happening right now. Times change and the world is in a continuing development. Countries are different from how they were 50 years ago, meaning that the way of leading them needs to change as well. This is why the involvement of teenagers and young adults is fundamental for better changes. Being born in an already different era from their parents, [aceasta propozitie principala trebuie sa aiba acelasi subiect ca prima parte, cea cu 'being...']problems and issues of politics are often understood much better from their perspective. We know that history helps with lessons but as for today�s life, not only the past does that but technology as well. It helps this new generation to be connected to the entire planet, making it easier than ever to see how others deal with an issue and learn from their approach.

On the other hand, there also disadvantages to young people following politics. Regardless of how much they learn from the various sources, teenagers are still children. Although the voting age is 18, that number does not represent maturity. [....linker]Politics is an important matter for the present and future of a country or even the entire world. For a young person who has yet reached a point of understanding of how politics work, ...... is useless to occupy their time with a matter that they cannot fully comprehend. [....linker]The youth is better off concentrating on individual studies and leaving politics to people with more life experience. Furthermore, for young people, following politics is not a priority. [....linker, uneste propozitiile]It is well known that school and college makes up most of the time of students, them keeping up with other such complicated matters being irrelevant for their future. If one is not interested in a career in this field, they should concentrate on their own future and save their free time for hobbies or sport that can improve their physical and mental health.

In conclusion, there are both benefits and disadvantages for young people following politics. While some believe the perspective of the youth can improve how the world is led, others think that young ones should not pay attention to these problems and focus on their personal lives and future.